"Early Fellini" (La Strada, La Dolce Vita, The Nights of Cabiria) -- "traditional" narrative; 8 1/2 and Rome, Amarcord -- I keep changing the fragments I show in class. Most often, for style, visual composition, images (semiotics of symbolism). Not only in Film Analysis class, but in THR470 Film directing.
Especially, interesting in contrast with Bergman, Tarkovsky and Kurosawa (national cinema, film-philosophy, theory -- topics).
I do not have any fragments from his screenplays on my webpages (2004).
Two pages on Fellini are not about Fellini, language of cinema...
Directing Amarcord on stage is still on my wish list. I don't know, if I can get to it.
Fellini deserves a semester of studying, at least. Or a year.
Maybe I will use his films for Film600 pages: "Bad Theory, Wrong Subjects."
Fellini and "Fellini"
Frank Burke, Fellini's Films: From Postwar to Postmodern. Published by [3]Macmillan/Twayne, New York, 1996[ ... ]
Intro to Fellini's Films: From Postwar to Postmodern. The selections from the Preface and the opening and concluding chapters are meant to indicate the kinds of methodology employed and the critical and intellectual context within which Fellini's work is situated. The table of contents makes clear that the bulk of the study involves detailed analyses of Fellini's films, which in turn lead to many of the conclusions in the final chapter. I have placed the table of contents last rather than first because the material that precedes it helps make the chapter titles more meaningful. - FB...
Preface
Federico Fellini would seem to need little by way of introduction. He may be the best known of the postwar Italian directors. He is also among the most noted filmmakers in the history of the medium. In 1980, Harry Reasoner claimed on CBS's Sixty Minutes that Fellini was "maybe the premier filmmaker of the age"--a pronouncement which may seem a bit exaggerated from the perspective of the 1990s but which also suggests the role Fellini played in international cinema from 1954 (La Strada) to at least 1973 (Amarcord). He was awarded five Oscars, and though he suffered decline in the public eye through the 1980s and early 1990s, his final Oscar was the 1993 lifetime achievement award of the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences. He received a similar award from Cannes as early as 1974, as well as the outstanding cinematic achievement award of the Film Society of Lincoln Center (New York City) in 1985.
Perhaps more important, Fellini's work continues to be a significant influence on the contemporary filmmaking scene. In a 1992 Sight and Sound survey, while neither he nor any of his films made it into the top ten of critics' favourite movies and directors, he ranked first among international directors surveyed. As Geoffrey Nowell-Smith put it in a subsequent issue of Sight and Sound: "The word is out. Federico Fellini is the directors' director par excellence...."
Chapter 1
FELLINI IN CONTEXT
This study will address two persistent "narratives" operating throughout Fellini's career. The first, which is largely thematic, is the rise and fall of individualism. The second, which is largely aesthetic (though with crucial cultural implications), is the movement from a relatively realist cinema, generally concealing the act of filmmaking itself, to a highly self-conscious examination of cinematic and narrative technique. This "self-reflexive" phase (to use a term common to film and literary criticism) has a movement of its own: from an exploration of principally cinematic representation to a questioning of the underlying conditions of representation and meaning themselves.
The fall of individualism is, interestingly, linked to the trajectory of Fellini's critical reputation. In a 1950s and 1960s ideological climate of heightened individualism, in which artists were marketed as cultural heroes and film was elevated to the status of artform, Fellini became, as [one critic] put it, he "director as superstar"--for academics as well as for a larger public. However, more recently, in a cultural and theoretical climate which has come to deny the autonomy of the individual, as well as the artwork, the modern artist-as-romantic-hero was debunked, and Fellini became viewed as an egoistic anachronism. . . .
POSTWAR INDIVIDUALISM, AMERICAN INFLUENCE, AND NEOREALISM . . .
While neorealism may have been Fellini's postwar cinematic context, individualism was the prevailing ideological current as he emerged as a scriptwriter and director. Individualism, of course, has a long history in Western culture. However, in the last 200 years, it has become synonymous with American ideology--and Fellini was heavily influenced in his youth by the American popular-culture promise of individual freedom . . . .
. . . .
Within the larger context of Western and American ideology, Fellini fashioned his own brand of individualism as an anti-authoritarian response to his Fascist and Catholic upbringing. . . .
Though Fellini abhorred Catholic dogmatism, this did not prevent him from fusing individualism in his early work with a secularized form of Christian humanism: a belief in the "salvation" of the individual via psychological individuation. The road to salvation was not the Way of the Cross, but the evolution of consciousness from the unconscious and the integration of all the fragmented and repressed aspects of the individual psyche.
. . . .
HIGH MODERNISM, AMERICAN IDEOLOGY, THE ART FILM
Fellini's U.S.-driven individualism dovetailed with three major movements in the arts and in film in the 1950s and 1960s: High Modernism, the Art Film, and Auteurism. . . .
POSTMODERNISM . . . .
. . . as countless observers have noted, a crucial cultural shift began to take place in the 1960s, accelerated in the 1970s, and became formalized (counter to its own anti-formulaic strategies) as "postmodernism." As the latter part of this study will argue, this shift dramatically affected Fellini's work, despite his frequently strong resistance to it.
. . . .
One of the most important themes of postmodern thought is the death of the "subject": the kind of self-determining individual or center of consciousness that Fellini sought to represent in his early work. . .
. . . Fellini's postmodernity was only partly a matter of theoretical and cultural ambience--and equally a matter of his own experience in relation to that larger context. . . .
Following the making of Juliet of the Spirits, Fellini suffered serious artistic, economic, and physical crises . . . promoting his own shift into postmodern modes of expression. . . . If Fellini's brush with death in 1967 contributed to a questioning of the creative freedom of the ever-evolving individual, his repeated brush with producers and with financial constraints from the late 1960s on inevitably accelerated his questioning of the autonomy of art and the artist. . . .
. . . .
FELLINI'S FILMS: FROM REALISM TO REPRESENTATION TO SIGNIFICATION
When Fellini moves from original or self-conceived projects to adaptation and reproduction, the emphasis in his films begins to shift from individuals (and artists) in search of authenticity, to art about art, texts about texts. This brings us to the second "narrative" I posited at the outset of this chapter, the movement of Fellini's career from a relatively realist aesthetic to a self-conscious concern with issues of representation and meaning.
. . . .
Fellini's movement from realism to representation reflects a broader renunciation of the real that has characterized Western art for the last 150 years or so. This renunciation, and a consequent turn toward self-questioning art, has been one of the hallmarks of aesthetic modernism (i.e., modernism in painting and literature).
. . . .
Chapter 11. POLITICS, GENDER, AND FELLINI'S CRITICAL REPUTATION
. . . Fellini's reputation has been in marked decline among film theorists and critics since the 1970s. . . .
The following is an attempt to address two general areas in which Fellini's films seem to generate the most problems for contemporary theorist/critics: politics and gender (which I will eventually link to sexual orientation). I use the first term broadly, to include not just engagement with overtly political issues but also the relationship of Fellini's work to larger social issues and the possibility for social change. The second term, strictly speaking, should be a subcategory of politics, particularly given my broad use of the term. However, because it has become such a significant issue unto itself in recent years--and because it is such a crucial issue on its own within Fellini's work--it works best as a separate area of consideration.
. . . .
It seems to me that there are three places to look for "politics" or social significance within Fellini's work: (1) films of broad and often insistent social critique from Variety Lights through La Dolce Vita but also including, to some extent, 8 1/2 and Juliet of the Spirits; (2) films that seem to deal specifically with political moments or problems (Amarcord, Orchestra Rehearsal); and (3) films that analyze and critique representation and signification (his work from "The Temptations of Dr. Antonio" through The Voice of the Moon). Though these areas are rough and overlapping (and, in fact, "(2)" will end up collapsed into "(3)" in my discussion, they provide a useful point of departure for discussing the "Fellinian social."
. . . .
I have addressed the issue of politics, the social, and Fellini in relation principally to post-'68 (1970s) cultural theory. New issues arise in relation to more recent theory, centered on cultural difference and generated by the increased assimilation and/or visibility of previously marginalized groups. (The causes of both the visibility and the theory have been numerous: decolonization; globalization; late capitalism's pursuit of new labour forces, new markets, and new consumer groups; and so on.) In light of such theory, Fellini's films are liable to the charge of Eurocentrism--of not seeing beyond the perspective of traditional white European (and European-derived, hence North American) culture.
. . . .
GENDER AND SEXUAL ORIENTATION
Gender
The area of recent theory for which Fellini's work is probably most problematic is gender. . . .
. . . I would argue that gender in Fellini is more complex than may initially seem the case [. . . in fact] intricate enough to reward at least three kinds of responses: feminist, "masculinist," and postmodern. At times the three overlap in mutually enhancing ways. At times they lead in quite different directions.
. . . .
Sexual Orientation
. . . Fellini's films seem quite conventionally and normatively heterosexual. Though Fellini had numerous gay friends and collaborators . . . the films tend to equate male homosexuality with stereotypical effeminacy. . . .
The most complex examination of sexual orientation in Fellini's work is Fellini-Satyricon. [Lengthy discussion of the film, as both positive and negative construction of gay experience.] . . .
. . . .
ASSESSMENT
[Brief concluding "balance sheet," of the relevance of Fellini's work, based on the preceding discussion.]
